Football Players In Jock Straps Whats Better Rugby Of Americian Football?

Whats better rugby of americian football? - football players in jock straps

Why do football players wear that padding all americium, but rugby players are just a mouthguard and jockey strap. There is no honor in these sports

10 comments:

AndyB said...

The only reason for success is greatest in football is because they carry half a ton of armor. Their players are not bigger or more on your own.

No, I take a hit from a football player when he was wearing a Kevlar body armor and I was not, but that is irrelevant.

In a rugby did not see the armor in general. Also shinguards are technically illegal, and I have never, never seen someone use a cup. The American players are not mixed together or jerk or bridges. No raked, or kicking, or like us, and we must do everything without armor.

If the samples have to do with the sheer force of their own bodies, and when we sampled did nothing to protect us.

I never is a rugby match without at least a half dozen shots on my body, I sometimes L Large shortens my legs and body, I had black eyes and bloody noses. How often do football players who made these wounds.

mickl84 said...

Rugby is by far the best of both. Rugby League the better of the two codes of rugby.

Football Player Players use the site, simply because they are large pieces of soft fat, which can not be the success of another human being be guaranteed. I understand your nessisery wear a kind of filler, but the amount you contribute is something about the joke, to use Evan kicker and weather.

And the fact that they have 3 teams in a club-rattling much (of my attack, defense and special teams )???? WTF. Is it because there are players Arent making smart enough to at least 3 or 2?. Or maybe the fear of crime are 2 defense?. Who knows?

eayrin said...

Rugby! bcos its not American

Paddles said...

Rugby ..... of course! Much faster pace.

summer said...

Rugby, rugby, rugby

T-time said...

Rugby is not stop-start nature of football, and players must not wear the ridiculous size of pills, because the idiots who are not treated.
Majorly successful football teams are the only country the United States, while the rugby all nations Colombia, Republic of Ireland, France, New Zealand, Australia and South Africa and many other developing countries.
This is the most successful rugby, and you'll probably find that a sport because it is usually preferable.

The question that by sam21462 that the stupidity of the football highlight:
"There is nothing in rugby is found fairly close to the impact velocity of the head in football head"

Also clear thathas not seen Colin Charvis of Wales disposed in a front against New Zealand (who are not necessarily opposed to this head "

Dean E said...

I play rugby in South Africa in 16 years and it is physical, but you only need the padding because there is a load of rules ****

Surely Not Bassey said...

If you are the football itself, the RAM with a force much more. You see guys doing tricks on others, etc., occur in basically a sport for people ran to the ball before popping up, the potentially affected Somone. This continuous protection. Rugby is my fav - I believe there are more players are involved - how to run the ball on Dogde many defenders and still score a test is brilliant!

Phillip K said...

Rugby won by force of will, have to get up to go to prepare a ball catching have decided to enter the back is (I have done many times).

wave said...

Rugby is popular with many great nations. American football is enjoyed one. I think I have answered the question!

Post a Comment